Andy's Glasses

a blog through the eyes…

Andy

ag2
October 5, 2013

I’m always looking for a new sport.

There’s just way too much time around and not enough sport to fill it. We need more. And I don’t mean, like, ‘playing it’. Heaven forbid. Sport’s not for playing, its for watching whilst eating loads of crap. So what do you do on a Sunday after the 1.30 and 4pm football, before the 7o’clock from Spain followed by NFL double-header taking you til 4 the next morning? There’s a whole half an hour when I get fretful.

Its a time for possibly cooking something. Or running round to the off license for supplies. But both of those involve, kind of, ‘getting up’ off the sofa, thus they’re not real sport. Real sport NEVER involves any movement beyond the remote control. That’s the rule. From the international federation of sports watchers and other fat bastards.

ag4
October 5, 2013

big event…

A new Woody Allen movie is a big event. I don’t care what you think. Its big. Even though there’s one every year and has been since Bananas in about 1657. When Woody was just 12 and still married to his sixth wife’s god-daughter’s neice. The man’s love life has been almost as erratic as his films. But I’ll always see them. I have to. I’m driven. Possessed. According to drug addicts, the first hit of heroin is such an incredible high that you spend the next 30 years trying to get it back. Well as a Woody addict, my first movie, and I can’t remember whether it was Play it again, Sam, or Bananas, or Take the Money and Run, was just such a ‘hit’, a ‘high’, such a drug, such a fantastic experience that I’ve spent the last 40 years trying to relive it.
ag5
October 4, 2013

wotch’it…

“Ere!!!!!” shouted the schoolboy across the playground, “did’joo call my mum a slag???”.
“No”, replied the spokesman from the Daily Mail, “I just called yer dad a frikkin traitor!”
Now pay careful attention because the next sentence is something rare, something dear, something to be kept for posterity, because it’ll never be writ again:
*****Ed Milliband was right. ******
Wow.
Its a tough contest between who is more hateful; the leader of the opposition party, the hapless, left-leaning lummox, or the Daily Mail, bastion of the right wing, so staunchly conservative and Conservative that its now just finding its true new home with UKIP, the views of which concur with that newspaper’s own dreams in a reactionary, xenophobic and overly nationalistic style. The (nominal) Conservative Party is currently insufficiently conservative for most of the Mail’s views.
So when, raking through Milliband’s father’s diaries, written when the man was 17 years old, before Ed was even a flicker of his imagination, before either Wallace or Grommit was born, they found a comment which said how ‘I sometimes think it would be better if England lost the war…’
ag6
October 4, 2013

upstaged…

Those canny Welsh have pipped us at the post. Again. Not only did they win the ‘most alcoholics as a percentage of population (not including sheep)’category in the olympics, then topped it with ‘most Welsh-speakers anywhere in the world’,  but now they’ve declared first in the ‘Cities fit to Cycle’ campaign initiative. Its about pledging cycle and walking paths to encourage people to, er, well, er, walk and cycle more for small, city journeys rather than fire up the Ferrari to pop to Tescos for a pint’a milk or catch a flight to the bookie shop on the corner to put a fiver each way on Craig Bellamy’s next goal.
ag7
October 1, 2013

wimmin…

I love women. Always have.
Not just the way they look and feel, but the very fact that they’re simply different. If they didn’t exist I’d have to invent one. Or at least buy a blow-up one. But the differences are way beyond the physical, way beyond anything that could be represented in mere vinyl. They’re different psychologically, physiologically, hormonally, temperamentally and logically. Or illogically sometimes.
Natalie Portman is a wonderful woman. Actress. And mother. Or mutha. Whatever.
And she reckons that Hollywood has it all wrong when it tries to depict ‘strong women’ in ‘feminist movies’. Because they’re stuck in that ‘Lara Croft’ mode in which a ‘strong woman’ is one who can kick the shit out of 10 armed men without smudging her mascara. A woman who is stunning, pneumatic, brilliant, beautiful, courageous, dangerous but never bigger than a size 12.
Is that ‘a feminist’? Is feminism about the ability to beat the shit out of men? Odd, I thought it was about living in peaceful, harmonious equality.
Man and his main bitch in glorious egalitarianism. Which is a suburb of Watford.
Newer Posts