Andy's Glasses

As my age has increased, so has the usage of personal screens and phones. 40 years ago, the time (average) spent looking at phones (to 2 decimal places) was… 0. You spoke into phones, looked at the dialling thing, didn’t look at the phones cos if you did you wouldn’t hear what the ‘other end’ was saying. And now, the average (mean and median) is, generally… all the fucking time. Therefore my age (in years… or days/weeks/whatevers) positively correlates with phone use. Very strongly. I’d say greater than 0.9.

So its my fault. All these tossers staring at screens all day is my fault. I did it. I caused it.

Did I fuck!

Because, statistics lesson 1: correlation is NOT causation. Lots of things correlate, particularly with time. Length of Lila’s hair with petrol prices. They correlate positively too.

So today I learn that ‘studying damages eyesight’. I always thought it was excessive masturbation that did that, but not according to a study at the University of Cardiff. They found that ‘those who were genetically predisposed to spend more time in education’ were more likely to become myopic.

Which to me is in fact a prime example, within a probability of less than 5%, of being total and utter bollocks.

How can anyone be ‘genetically predetermined to be educated’? Spending more time in education depends on, first and foremost, socio-economic situation. Then on parental influence, then on intelligence, possibly. And socio-economics is not genetically marked. It is definitely hereditary but there’s no ‘gene’ for it.

And even if there was, a point I’d like to stress, in case I haven’t previously: CORRELATION IS NOT FUCKING CAUSATION!!!!! So even if there was a gene for ‘length of education’, which is as likely having a gene for favourite tv programme, and it did correlate with short-sightedness, that still would not mean that it was causative.

Its also worth noting that even if ‘education’ and study was the cause of this allegedly increasing myopia (not something that concerns me with any thought other than increasing stock levels at work), you also have to look at what kids do when they’re not studying. They staring at phones and games consoles and computer screens. Its not like they’re out on their bikes, like we were, in the fresh air, playing football, shoplifting, good healthy stuff. They’re surfing porn on mobile phones. That should positively make them blind.

I despair.

Happy Thursday

A xxxx

Fake news. Its all the rage. Personally, I’ve been doing it almost every day for decades. Distorting the truth, telling porky-pies, making statements that I positively know to be untrue. But that’s called ‘satire’ and thus is allowed (I’m digging here, help meeee). But when it happens on an industrial scale, when it affects elections, when its done within the institutional world, then its a bit more insidious, a bit nasty and quite frankly, its wrong.

So I went to a talk last night, given by Charlotte Henry, whose book, entitled ‘not buying it’, which is being published as you read this, is all about fake news. Is that true? Or is it fake? Ooohhhhh… It was also about a phrase I’d not heard before but instantly fell in love with: “post-truth”. I love it because it conjures up a time when the truth is redundant, when we reach an era in which there’s no longer a need for honesty anywhere. But it don’t mean that. Sadly. Or gladly. What it means is that the meaning of an argument is actually secondary to the message given, that message designed to appeal on an emotional level. Like Nigel Farage’s great pre-Brexit picture of a boatload of non-white refugees queuing up to come to England. We all knew that middle-Eastern and far-Eastern migrants aren’t part of the EU, therefore had nothing to do with Brexit. But that image hit emotions in a debate which had been Faraged into one about immigration and the picture spoke a million words. None of which were actually part of the argument. Similarly the “£350million a week for the NHS when we leave Europe!!!!!” didn’t need even refuting it was so patently stupid and misleading. But emotionally people loved it. Nothing evokes more emotion in ‘little England’ than the NHS… except maybe immigration.

Fake news is different. Its self-serving, done to make money. Teams of scallywags in Eastern Europe make up stupid stories which get posted online and however daft they are, every ‘hit’ they receive pays them money through Google-ads or wherever. They don’t care about the message, nor the impact, just the dosh. “Elvis shagged my granny! Last Night!!!” is of the same interest to these people as “Trump joins the KKK”.

The whole ‘post-truth’ thing is a modern take on what was called ‘spin’. There’s intention to deceive, there’s moving the gist of the story away from what’s unfavourable and twisting it into a more flattering light. Because the emotional side with spin was gained by changing the bias.

There all biased. They’re all liars, spinners, post-truthist fake-newsers and bastards.

If you don’t read it here you simply can’t believe it.

Happy Sunday

A xxxx

We’re getting ready for the World Cup. As an England fan that means getting in the beers and the flags (cross of St George, obvs, the Union Jack is banned because it references Scotland), all kinds of things to wave (at the tv) and make noise with, plus, obviously a big box of tissues (for the penalty shoot-out we inevitably lose to Germany) and a new bottle of whisky for consolation. I’m more of an England fan this time than usual because our national team looks so much like Spurs. Unfortunately though, they’re not quite as good as Spurs. And my apparent capacity for sharing the love to international teams peaked in 1970 and has been going steadily downhill ever since. But as a testament to the Premier League, England provides more players to all the world cup teams than any other nation. More world superstars play here than in Spain, France, Italy or Germany. The rest of the world doesn’t even get a look in.

But in the midst of all the media shit surrounding this massive event, I’m drawn constantly to events in Madrid. Because of 2 things resulting from Zidane’s ‘resignation’. Firstly and most importantly, the continued tie-up between Real and Pochettino. With both parties willing to talk and discuss, even though the latter party just signed a brand-new deal with Spurs paying him about 8 million a year. Though I noted last night that Mauricio wasn’t on the new, revised list of possible managers for the Bernabau. And why would he go? Zidane won 3 consecutive champions leagues and it wasn’t enough.

The other feature of Zidane’s departure is that Gareth Bale probably won’t be leaving now. For some reason Zizou never liked Bale enough to play him with the regularity you’d expect having, at the time, inherited the world’s most expensive player. Bale hinted he’d leave if he didn’t play more. Strongly hinted. But with no Zidane, Bale will surely get much more exposure, as he deserves and showed at the final the other weekend. I just don’t want him playing for Man United.

And Kanu, remember Kanu? Like a pre-incarnation of Adebayor? He turned up in Moscow and the lovely baggage handlers stole £8,200 in cash from his bag. They were caught, the money recovered and duly returned. Phew. A few have pondered as to why anyone would travel with so much cash on them. Which is a worthy question in normal circumstances. But Nigerians and money is a world unto itself. But if you want to know the reason, send your bank details, pin number, mother’s maiden name and three passwords and I’ll tell you.

Happy Tuesday

A xxxx

What do you personally find ‘disgusting’? What revolts you? Makes you cringe? Causes a gag reflex? Invokes a shudder? Well, the chances are that if you’re a woman (or really have always wanted to be one) the list will be much longer. And the chances are that I might even be on it.

But ‘tests have shown’ (zzzzzz) that the designation of ‘disgusting’ is far more profound among women than men. And I love a real, honest-to-goodness, gender difference that they can’t shout ‘me too!’ about.

They showed images of things to lots of people at the London School of Hygiene, to men, women and all others. Lumpy milk, skin lesions, gone-off food, someone using someone else’s roll-on deodorant, eating something off the floor and ‘sexual situations’ (undefined in the article I read but you can imagine… ok, I can imagine). And the subjects scored the images for levels of ‘how disgUSTING is THAT!!!???

And sour milk and skin lesions aside, there’s not really much I actually find ‘disgusting’. Though many people find me to be totally so. I’ve never been ‘precious’ about hygiene. Other than my own, showering twice every day. But whereas I have the ‘2-second rule’ about eating food off the floor, especially chocolate which automatically receives an unlimited extension, Mel has a ‘if it even looked like it might have fallen on the floor, throw it out’ rule that is total. Lila doesn’t, oddly, and she’s a proto-woman. And is thus on life’s ‘learning curve’ in which the consumption of mud, sand and earthworms is a mandatory requirement. Only then can you define ‘disgusting’ with any sense of objectivity.

They reckon this unquestionable gender difference stems from women’s ability to produce only a few offspring whilst men can father thousands. Each week. So women need to be more aware of potential diseases and infections. But there again, they always reduce any genuine gender difference to reproductive specialising because they’re really not allowed to speculate on other causes that may offend the militant femmies.

And its not my place to cause offence. Its just my hobby.

Happy hygienic Monday

A xxxx

I’m going to revisit feminism because: a. its relevant, b. its important, c. its funny and a really easy source for winding everybody up. And also because I just listened to a debate on the radio asking: can a man ever be a feminist? Which is as stupid a question as it is rhetorical because if only women are allowed then they’re just singing to the choir as its obviously the men that really needed changing.

I am a feminist. I think. And then comes the ‘why?’ And that’s when it all becomes a bit stereotypical and pigeon-holing and predictably stupid. I was listening to the radio because I was cooking. OMG! A man! Cooking!! At home!!! (you’re allowed to be Gordon Ramsey or Heston Blumenthal but cook in your own kitchen and people get impressed or feel sorry for you).

And I used to get phone calls from my daughters whilst I was out shopping requesting… female products. Sanitary towels, tampons, eeeuuuuwwww. And I was never bothered. Yeah ok, ya want the purple pack ‘with wings’, yeah? Having the conversation never bothered me, buying the products never bothered me.

I also strongly believe (again, I have fairly high-powered working daughters and wife so its in my best interests) in workplace equality and equal pay. Nothing else makes any sense at all. The best person for the job is the best person for the job, whether they possess tits or not. Ooops.

So, politically, practically and consciously I am a feminist by almost all definitions (that I’d be prepared to listen to). Then comes the stupidity. Someone compiled a list of adverts from all over the world (including even the UK!!!!) which ‘objectify women’! Which use a pair of legs, a cleavage, a pert derriere, to attract the attention of… probably men, in an attempt to sell stuff. And that’s the red line to which ‘real’ feminists apparently sit on one side, and I’m firmly on the other. For one simple reason. Men like to look at beautiful women. If they didn’t the world would be totally fucked. Or perhaps, literally, not fucked at all. Either way, big trouble. If men were no longer allowed to, even internally, drool over provocative images then that would mean that the total and complete emasculation of half the world’s population had occurred, in the name of political fucking correctness, political castration would have occurred.

And furthermore, the debate enters totally FUBAR levels of insanity when a pole dancer is the definition of ‘objectification’ whereas Beyonce doing the same thing in her latest video is ’empowerment’, taking control of her body as she sees fit. And she’s well fit.

Do feminists really want to live in a world in which men have been conditioned to no longer be stimulated by their presence? If that’s where we’re headed, shoot me now.

Otherwise, have a fab Sunday

A xxxx

OMG! Top Gun is back!!! The (almost, nearly, kind’a) best film ever (one of about 428 candidates) is being sequelised. Being re-done, re-visited, re-born, re-kindled. But you can’t get it on kindle, you have to go to the movies. And Tom Cruise is returning as Maverick. Which either means that he’s failed fighter pilot school for the past 32 annual attempts since the original in 1986 and is still ‘the rogue pupil’ or they’re bringing him back in some other capacity. Like as a teacher, or the grizzled, veteran, superhero of a thousand dog-fights. And I think they’re going to make him taller this time. Like they did when he played 6 foot 4 Jack Reacher. Easy in movieland to grow 8 inches. Or maybe it’ll be set in the Top Gun retirement home for ex-super-hero-fighter-pilots-and-other-really-cool-babe-magnets.

Kelly McGillis won’t be in this one, I’m guessing. And if she is she’ll be playing Tom’s grandma. The real unfairness of the movie industry, its not all about the money, its about men retaining the right to play ‘cool’ into their 90s whilst women can only do ‘babe’ until they’re 32. By the time they’re 41 they can only do grandmas or waitresses in diners. Whilst a man at 50 can still be the quarterback in a High School movie. Time’s Up is a political thing and won’t affect casting whatsoever.

Tom is going to be flying a fab F15 bomber-jet-fighter thing. Made from cheap Chinese steel, assembled in Canada and controlled by British technology and missile system with a French white flag under the seat, just in case. (The French have loads).

But that’s all set to end. Trump, pissed off about (everything really, but mainly-) the cheap steel from China, he’s decided to put punitive import tax on… everything except Chinese steel. No, I can’t see the logic either, but this is Trump we’re talking about. So he’ll tax BMWs and British steel and English asparagus and I heart Megan hats and Scotch (because he’s a fucking teetotaller) and all things of a Euro or even a soon-to-be-ex-Euro nature. Pasta’s going up, French bread dearer than gold. Even Canada gets increased duty put on… maple syrup, polar bears… other things Canadians sell to America. And in return, we’ll hike the tax on Levis and Harley Davidsons and Jack Daniels. China remains unaffected.

At least we won’t have to pay more for films. But I reckon Top Gun 2 or whatever they call it will be a tragic disappointment. You can’t repeat brilliant. As much because of the zeitgeist. The original took our breath away and had ‘1980s’ stamped all over it. But ok, what time you wanna go? I’m in.

Happy Saturday

A xxxx

‘Ere? Wanna really great laugh with all yer friends and family, but like a real scream? Fantastic fun for everyone? Here’s what you do.

You go to Kiev, in Ukraine, where they hate Russia, and you get the government there to put out a statement that you’ve been murdered by Russian agents, gunned down in your own doorway-in-exile. Because if you’re a Russian journalist, hated by Putin for being very outspoken against the regime there and always banging on about freedom of speech and fake news, what better way to do things than to heap layer upon layer of irony, faking news yourself to make the point about the evils of fake news. That point being… ah, that’s all part of the fun, fun, fun!!! And then, (this is the really fab bit), when you’re friends are just getting over the shock, when your family has dried up the first batch of agonised tears, you come on tv and announce: “I voz on-lee yokking!!! Haaa, haaa, haaaa…!!!”

What a frikkin riot, that Arkady Babchenko.

Though he didn’t actually do it for laughs, he did it to make a point. See above to understand just how great a point it was he made.

Lila-day has been officially extended to Lila-day-and-the-night-before. That way, oddly, its less of a panic in the morning than to go to her house in time for her mummy to go to work, we can ‘relax’. At half past six in the fucking morning. But in fact babies have developed the most amazing, Darwinian survival strategy. They become incredibly gorgeous when they wake up. Even more gorgeous than the rest of the time. Otherwise, quite frankly, who’d wanna know them at that time of the day? So as you go in at some un-godly hour of the dawn, in semi-sleep, total-grouch mode, they switch it on. And you melt. And within 5 minutes you’re wishing she could have woken you even earlier. Almost. Therefore Lila comes over, plays bridge with us (she’s awfully bright, MY baby) and sleeps over.

Happy what would be Lila-day but due to staff stuff, I’m actually working, dammit.

A xxxx

My body is a clean sheet. I have no tattoos. I have scars, plenty of them, but no ‘ink’. A couple of Christmases ago we were in India, walking in the glorious sunshine down the main street in Goa when we came across a tattoo parlour. As you would in Goa. Next to the shop selling ivory elephants. Across from the ‘British Pub’ offering ‘full English breakfasts’. And I saw the tattoo place and said to Mel, ‘come on, let’s go get tattoos; one each’. And I almost meant it. I realise there is nothing sadder than fresh ink on a middle-aged body, but if Mel had agreed, I’d have even faced up to my lifelong needle-phobia and got drawn upon. But of course, she just laughed, not giving the suggestion the credibility it warranted. She assumed I was joking. “Just a little one” I said.”You have the ‘yin’ and I’ll have the ‘yang’, under our armpits where no-one will see them. Soles of our feet. On our bums. Or maybe a 9 inch swastika across the centre of our faces?”

But the question is always, particularly, I’d imagine for the first tattoo, what do you have? What symbol, word(s), picture can you paint PERMANENTLY that you choose it to represent something/someone/everything? A drawing so profound it summarises your very soul.

A Tottenham cockerel, obviously. Don’t think Mel would be so keen. Our names in hearts? Not too nauseating. Our children’s names, in case we forget them when we’re really old? Lila?? Though she wasn’t born then. A pair of glasses? A Bugatti? An anchor? A portrait of Ant & Dec, with Ant shaded out?

But at no stage did I consider a gun. Why would you? Unless you were into gun culture or any other resident of Texas, Florida, Alabama… or Raheem Sterling. Who, in case you missed it, chose to have not just any gun but an M16 assault rifle inked onto his right calf. And, particularly with just 3 weeks to go before the World Cup and Raheem one of our absolute stars, the first question to ask is: who fucking cares? He’s a footballer. They have no sense, just loads of money which they like to convert into pictures all over themselves. There’s no ‘meaning’, there’s no logic, no train of thought, its just ink. Wayne Rooney has a fuck-off cross on his arm. Which he possibly covered when out shagging over-age prostitutes whilst his wife was pregnant. It doesn’t mean anything. Certainly, in Wayne’s case, no sense of faith, belief or morality, heaven forbid.

Anti-gun people are making all sorts of accusations about ‘glamourising gun crime’ and ‘role models’ and shit, but it is just shit. Its a tattoo. In Raheem’s case, one of many. None of which probably mean any more than the sanskrit text on his forearm which he was told translated as: ‘light is life’ or some pseudo-philosophical tosh, but which actually reads: ‘another stupid, gullible Englishman who can’t read Sanskrit’.

Looking for arguments about the meaning of tattoos is daft. Leave the poor twit alone.

Happy Wednesday

A xxxx

Ok, I’ve been home a day, I’ve seen the lightening (holy shit, did I see lightening), I’ve mown the lawn, I’ve played with Lila, so can I go back to Moscow now? Is it time? Is it still called ‘defecting’ even if its just for a holiday? I missed Russia (other than those events above) terribly until Mel got in the bath last night. And then I surfed the tv channels. Watched the new video by Jess Glynn, which is great, and then saw, ‘England vs Barbarians’ on Sky Sports something. There used to be 4 Sky Sports channels, now there’s 246. Most of them showing the same 4 things but doubtless makes Sky feel better about themselves. So I flicked and it was just starting so would be the perfect accompaniment to the sunday papers.

Which didn’t get read. Even opened. The Baa-baas scored their first (of what ended up as 9!!) tries 2 minutes after the start. But it wasn’t really that in itself that was so captivating, it was the style in which they played. You kind of expect that from the Barbarians who started in 1890 (ya gotta love rugby) as a representative team from all clubs/nations whose brief is to dazzle if not always necessarily to win. That in itself makes it unique in world sport. Its not about the winning, its about the style, the attitude. Liberated by the shirt. If you think it pointless to ever play competitive sport without desperation to win, then you’re probably American. Here we do it all the time… ish. And on a philosophical level I appreciate that. Not just because it gives an intellectual gravitas to a man who would otherwise be just another football hooligan, but because that’s the tennis I play. Ridiculously flamboyant, outrageous shot-selection, go for absolutely any and everything on or off the court, but no points offered nor accepted. You end up being competitive against yourself, striving to do it better. How fucking noble is that??

And as soon as the newspaper arrives the first thing I look for is the status of the next wedding. Between Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump. Its on… its off… its on… it maybe off… China’s to blame… we love each other like no other clown-like national presidents have ever loved each other’s hair styles… you’re a little rocket man/you’re a fat orange dipshit… let’s call the whole thing off. Then on again.

Repeat until one or other, or preferably both simply explode.

A new Israeli felafel bar just opened up in Temple Fortune, opposite the police station (if you need to ask directions) and is fantastic. Anywhere that actually writes on the menu: “if you like spicy then just tell us” is exactly where I want to be at mealtime. But who invented felafel? And who invented hummus?? About 97 nations all claim both, because chick peas probably grow in all of them, but they must have started life somewhere. I’m guessing probably not in Temple Fortune.

Happy bank holiday Monday

A xxxx

My facebook photo is Gareth Bale. In a Spurs shirt. Making the ‘heart’ sign he did every time he scored. Which was ever such a lot. He left Spurs in 2013 but that’s fine. The photo has become ‘ironic’. Yet when one of (previously) ‘your own’ does good things you score ‘points’. Its like, when Harry Kane scores, that goal is yours. When Gareth Bale scores, it is 10% yours. Its the nature of the contract. We’re allowed a kind of ‘glory-by-association’ on former players. Not Arsenal players, obviously, they always leave under the most acrimonious of circumstances and generally join the Gunners’ rivals. Like Van Persie, Fabregas, Sanchez. But nice players. Spurs players.

So although I wanted Liverpool to win last night due solely to some misplaced sense of nationalism, another part of me was really rooting for Gareth Bale and the sublime Luka Modric, everyone’s favourite Croatian, both of whom happen to play for Real Madrid, having previously worn an different white shirt, that of Tottenham. And I’m not sure whether it was the brilliance of Bale which won the match for Real, giving them their 3rd consecutive Champions League title, or the abysmal goal-keeping of poor, hapless Karius who had the nightmare of nightmare games.

Strikers play on confidence. ‘You’re only as good as your last goal’ kind’a thing. But goalies are different. They’re always as bad as their worst cock-up. Paul Robinson had a terrible event in an England game when Gary Neville’s backpass bounced over his head and he was never the same again. No matter how many wonderful saves he made, he seemed cursed by that moment. So how is Karius, who has been a bit doubtful most of the season, going to get past almost gifting Real Madrid 2 of their 3 goals? However he decides to try, you kind of feel he ain’t gonna be doing it at Liverpool. Nor, hopefully, at Spurs.

Meanwhile, look at my rhododendron bush. Just look. Go on. Its fab. And only looks like this for a couple of weeks a year. When we went to Russia it was green with a few shoots starting to appear. We come back a week later and LOOK! And its covered in bees, which is apparently a good thing, because we love bees. Apparently. That hedge is at least 3 metres high, so the bush is a big one. We’ve been here nearly 30 years and it was ‘mature’ then. No idea how mature, bit like me, but it always gives me an ‘isn’t nature wonderful!!’ moment.

Happy Sunday

A xxxx