Oh dear, its all getting a bit Harvey Weinstein over in Parliament. Actually, it always been so in the hallowed halls of Westminster, its just that, unlike 100 years ago, its no longer allowed. Not that there were women in Government 100 years ago, but they’d just started to creep in, having just been allowed to vote. Presumably before that it was just a bit more Kevin Spacey. The problem being that where there are groups of men, there are, generally, groups of penises. And there lies the problem. Dangles the problem, maybe.

Fresh on the heels (6-inch, stiletto) of Angela’s-thighs-gate comes Porn-gate. Misogyny: The Sequel! In which the star (as yet unnamed) sits in a debate in parliament watching pornography on his phone. Which, apparently, is not a good thing. I have no idea what type of porn he was watching, no-one else seems to think that important. They’re more concerned with the implicit misogynism of watching porn in the first place. No-one else seems concerned that he was ‘enjoying’ this ‘leisure activity’ on my fucking dollar! We, the tax payers, finance our government, pay their wages, so they can work on official matters of state on our behalf and behest. Yet Johnny Tory was pretending he was so engaged whilst his actual reality was in Lesbian Threesomes with Animals. Or some such. And you simply can NOT decide on the future of HS2 when stuck between 3 lesbians and a donkey. It’s simply not possible. It’s not a question of the gender of the donkey even. It’s a moral issue.

Watching pornography is an act of misogyny. And that’s the problem. According to those who decide on the nature of problems. Pornography objectifies women. Unless you’re watching gay male porn, then it doesn’t. So at least 60% of male Tory MPs are safe from that accusation. Whilst the other 40% are staring at Angela Rayner’s thighs. Though, if I’m honest, and speaking as a straight, cis-male, superman, stud, icon of manliness exemplified!!!, why would you wanna look at any part of her?

Pornography is there. It is not a crime to watch it. It’s there to show young men how to abuse women, treat them like shit and judge them as worthless shag-toys. And how else would they learn that? But Westminster is just not the place to view it. Not while I’m paying.

I just thought someone had to take an objective and logical look at this and clarify the matter completely.

Happy Thursday

A xxxx