Using big words is not clever. Unless I do it. Using the correct words in the right place is desirable and can avoid ambiguity. The mere additionalisation of complexicated verbositage to accentualise the perceptification of intelligiencial appearances is the domain of uneducated tossers with (quite deserved) inferiority complexes, small penises, West Ham scarves and bad breath. Or ‘Russell Brand’, as its now known.

A third rate unwashed comedian who fancies himself (well no-one else does other than part-heiress, part-man, Jemima Khan) as some kind of ‘people’s poet’, some type of revolutionary leader, a spokesman for the ignorant masses, who are all, generally, less ignorant than he is.

When still a comedian (though not a particularly funny one) he shot to fame by ‘prank-calling’ an 80 year-old retired actor to tell him that he (Russell) had shagged the old man’s grand-daughter, in graphic detail. Yes, really funny. Really, really funny.

So he went to Hollywood as some kind of ‘lothario’, some kind of irresistible dream of manhood perfection, bad-boy, lock-yer-daughters-up, sex machine. Even though he’s gay. Well, even though he sounds like he’s gay and the role he plays is merely a form of public denial of the pitifully obvious.

So now, buoyed by the most undeserved success, he’s written a book, called ‘revolution’ and has entered the political fray as an anti-politicist. Which is a bit like joining a football club as the director of ballet. He has no policies, which comes as no suprise, but aspires to be the next Mayor of London. God help London. He speaks in anti-capitalist sound-bytes that have no meaning to anyone this side of Carl Marx’s death. He talks of ‘collectives’, bless him. He doesn’t understand economics. And is passionately anti-American. To the point that he is a ‘9-11-denier’, feeling that Al Quaeda weren’t necessarilly responsible for the worst terrorist atrocity of our time, he wouldn’t put it past the Americans to have done it themselves. Fuckwit.

And he feels the BBC has an ‘anti-Islmaist agenda’ because it accused the Canadian gunman in a ‘anti-jihadist narrative’. Which is a bit like calling them ‘anti-Conservative’ for calling David Cameron a tory.

I will not mention this vile person any more because I don’t wish his name to appear anywhere that I might see it. Let alone that face, which even managed to hi-jack an interview with Sam Allardyce yesterday on Match of the Day. If necessary we must ban West Ham too, for spawning such an evil. Certainly until they stop winning games.

And there are so many other important things to consider, like the European demand for £1.7 billion from Britain due to our economy being better than those of so many of our European ‘brethren’ states. The calculation for this ridiculous amount takes into consideration such measures as ‘the black economy’ and prostitution. Maybe even both. Neither of which are quantifiable, which is kind of a definition of a ‘black enconomy’. And whilst prostitution is not illegal, living off immoral earnings is illegal. Thus Britain would be party to an immoral and illegal act were we to part with our money to those horrible Franco-German pimps. My own advice about this is: fuck ’em! Not the prostitutes, necessarily, but Europe.

Happy Sunday

A xxxx